I've just finished teaching a four-day version of the course at the UK Met Office in Exeter. I think it went reasonably well, even if we did version control last instead of first :-). Here's the feedback the students gave me:
- Most of what the instructor told us was probably true!
- Liked the emphasis on the human aspects of software development
- Liked the emphasis on evidence-based software engineering
- Lots of details on how to do testing
- Liked it when the instructor went off on tangents
- Liked having pointers to more material
- Instructor enthusiastic
- Lots of stuff on course web site
- Enjoyed learning a new language
- Finally had someone explain why to make code readable
- Nice mix of concepts and details
- Modular course design allowed me to catch up when I got lost
- No overall roadmap or guide
- Some (many?) parts too fast
- Didn't have access to the code the instructor was writing "live"
- Instructor went off on too many tangents
- The links the instructor mentioned aren't collected anywhere
- There weren't any tea breaks on the first two days (tiring)
- Need citations for claims that "studies show"
- Some people left behind in some parts
- Squeezing it into a week made some parts indigestible
- Had to learn a new language
- Don't know where to go next with Python
- The first two days felt rushed
- Some of the examples could have been better fits for this audience
ASSESSMENT · UK MET OFFICE
Dialogue & Discussion
You can review our commenting policy here.